SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Anil Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. administrative actions following the judgment (Para 1 , 8 , 11 , 12)
2. settlement of disputes and payment of amount (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6)
3. request for no objection certificate (Para 4 , 7)
4. satisfaction of the arbitral award (Para 9)
5. appeal disposed of as infructuous (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL.25330/2021 & FAO 189/2016

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. This is an application on behalf of the appellant under Order XIII Rule 3 CPC seeking to place on record a settlement between the appellant and respondent with regard to the award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has paid a sum of Rs.35,000/- in full and final settlement of the subject loan account with the respondent. Learned counsel submits that on payment of the said amount, nothing is further due from the appellant.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent be also directed to furnish a no objection certificate.

5. Learned counsel for the respondent also confirms that full and final settlement amount has been paid by the appellant and now there is nothing recoverab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top