SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Leprosy Mission Trust India - Appellant
Versus
Collector of Stamps - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2459 of 2021
Decided On : 10-03-2021




The absence of a designated Chief Controlling Revenue Authority prevents the processing of revision applications regarding stamp duty penalties until appointing authority is fulfilled.

Headnote:(A) Indian Stamps Act, 1899 - Article 62(e) - Section 40 - Transfer Deed determined to be insufficiently stamped, leading to imposition of 100% penalty for non-payment of ad valorem stamp duty - The petitioner argued that no Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (CCRA) had been appointed to hear revision application. (Paras 6, 7)

(B) Administrative Proceedings - The court directed the expeditious filling of the CCRA post for further action on the revision application and mandated no coercive measures until the application is heard. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenges an order stating that a Transfer Deed was insufficiently stamped under the applicable stamp law, imposing a substantial penalty. The petitioner filed a revision application, which could not be processed due to the absence of a CCRA.

Findings of Court:
The court orders the swift appointment of a CCRA and stipulates that actions against the petitioner shall be halted until their appeal is addressed.

Issues: Whether the petitioner’s revision application can be processed without a CCRA and the legality of imposing penalties for the non-payment of stamp duty.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that without a CCRA in place, the claimed rights to contest the penalty cannot be validated until such authority is constituted.

Result: Petition is disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. final order and directions of the court. (Para 1 , 5 , 15 , 16)
2. details of the impugned order and petitioner's claims. (Para 2 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's directions regarding the processing of the revision application. (Para 3 , 4 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. government's stance on recovery of dues. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.9763/2021

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a restraint on the respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner for recovery of the amount as directed by impugned order dated 01.10.2019.

3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is taken up for consideration. Next date of hearing i.e. 16.04.2021 is cancelled.

5. Application is disposed of.

W.P. (C)2459/2021

6. Petitioner has impugned order dated 01.10.2019 whereby the Collector of Stamps has held that the Transfer Deed was insufficiently stamped being is not covered under Article 62(e) of the Indian Stamps Act, 1899 and ad valorem stamp duty is liable to be paid.

7. The Collector of Stamps has held that since the ad valorem stamp duty was not paid, it was a fit case for imposition of penalty under Section 40 of the Indian Stamp Act and consequently 100% penalty has been imposed. The Collector has directed the petitioner to pay the duty of Rs.19,98,99,874/-.

8. Subject writ petition has been filed on the ground that the Revision Application has been filed by the petitioner before the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (CCRA for short) and since no CCRA has been appointed, the revision application filed by the petitioner cannot be taken up for consideration.

9. Mr. Ramesh Singh, learned standing counsel appearing for Govt. of NCT of Delhi submits that the file has already been placed before the competent authority for appointment of the CCRA and the Authority is likely to be appointed shortly.

10. Mr. Ramesh Singh, learned standing counsel further submits that one of the ways of recovery of the dues as arrears of land revenue is by attachment and sale of movable and immovable assets of the person from whom amount is due.

11. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent to expeditiously fill up the post of the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and thereafter the Revision Application filed by the petitioner be taken up by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority within two weeks of assuming charge and be disposed of in accordance with law.

12. Till the time the Revision Application is taken up for consideration, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. The petitioner shall also not create any third party rights in the subject property or transfer possession of the subject property till the time CCRA takes up for consideration the Revision Application.

13. This protection shall be available to the petitioner only till the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority takes up for consideration the Revision Application/stay application. The continuation of protection thereafter would be subject to orders to be passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority.

14. It is clarified that the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority shall decide the Revision Application/stay application without being influenced by anything stated in this order.

15. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

16. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top