SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Salman – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J.

1. This revision petition filed under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C is directed against the order dated 07.03.2018, passed by the Additional Session Judge-06, (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi, in SC No. 130/2017, framing charges against the petitioner for offences under Sections 308 , 385, and 34 IPC. It is stated that on 10.10.2016, at about 3:25 A.M. an information was received that a man has been stabbed in front of Okhla Sabzi Mandi. The said message was entered vide DD No.6-PP at Police Post S.N. Puri.

2. In the hospital the complainant/respondent No.2 told the police that he conducts business of selling vegetables near Gate No. 2, Okhla Sabzi Mandi. It is alleged in the FIR that one Anwar/petitioner No.4 herein and his children Salman/petitioner No.1 herein, Shahrukh/petitioner No.2 herein and Imran/petitioner No.3 herein, who also do business of selling vegetables used to demand money from the complainant/respondent No.2 for conducting business there. It is stated that on 10.10.2016, the petitioners came to the complainant, Anwar was armed with a Danda, Imran and Shahrukh were armed with iron rods and Salman was armed with a knife. They demanded

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top