SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Amit Bansal, JJ.
Aditya Ayurved College and Research Centre Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
LPA 84 of 2021 & CM No. 7910 of 2021 (for stay)
Decided On : 17-03-2021




The court held that delay in administrative decisions does not excuse failure to apply within prescribed time limits, and online approval processes require strict verification standards.

Headnote:(A) Legal principles pertaining to administrative decisions and educational regulations were discussed, particularly regarding the process and timing for increasing admission capacities in medical institutions. The court examined procedural delays and their implications on the appellant's ability to apply for course changes. (Paras 3-20)

(B) Appellate authority in administrative matters must ensure fairness and avoid compromising potential students' futures. Standards of prima facie evidence, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience were key in determining the outcome. (Paras 14-20)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, a college established in 2007, applied to increase its BAMS admission capacity from 50 to 100 students, but its application was denied due to procedural delays and failure to submit a fresh application by the deadline, exacerbated by the pandemic. (Paras 3-8)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the college did not demonstrate the requisite conditions for granting interim relief, focusing on the failure to apply timely and the potential harm to students if admissions were considered without valid approval. (Paras 12-20)

Issues: The main issue was whether the delay in the decision affected the college's right to a new application for the upcoming academic session and the implications of online approval processes without physical inspections. (Paras 6-10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the online application process does not extend to alterations in admission capacity under the pandemic regulations unless sufficient due diligence and physical verification can be assured. It emphasized the need for a prima facie case in administrative appeals to protect student interests. (Paras 19-20)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. appeal process and prior orders (Para 1 , 2)
2. establishment and admission details of appellant college (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. application process for admission capacity increase (Para 6 , 7)
4. arguments regarding the appellant's entitlement (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. citing precedents and relevance of regulations (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. court’s caution against interim admissions (Para 14 , 19 , 20)
7. clarification on online application procedures (Para 15 , 16 , 18)
8. dismissal of the appeal (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. This Intra-Court Appeal impugns the order dated 22nd February, 2021 of dismissal of CM No.2632/2021 filed by the appellant/writ petitioner Aditya Ayurved College and Research Centre Ltd. (appellant College) in W.P.(C) No.13031/2019, also filed by the appellant College.

2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 26th February, 2021, when notice thereof was ordered to be issued. The appeal thereafter was listed on 12th March, 2021 but could not be taken up for hearing owing to the Division Bench having not assembled on that date and was adjourned to 15th March, 2021, when it was ordered to be listed before another Bench on 16th March, 2021. In the meantime, the appellant College filed SLP (C) Nos.4260-4261/2021 against the order dated 26th February, 2021 of the Division Bench and vide order dated 9th March, 2021, Supreme Court requested this Court to take up the appeal immediately. The appeal came up before this Bench yesterday i.e. on 16th March, 2021, the senior counsel for the appellant College was heard; though hearing of arguments of the counsels for the respondents also began yesterday, but remained inconclusive owing to instructions required by the counsels for respondents. We have further heard the counsels today.

3. The appellant College claims, to have been established in the year 2007, to impart education in Ayurveda System of Indian Medicine and further claims to be affiliated to the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences and, since the year 2007, admitting 50 students annually in Undergraduate Course in Bachelor of Ayurveda, Medical & Surgery (BAMS). It is the case of the appellant College, (i) that the appellant College, vide application dated 29th August, 2018 to the respondent No.1 Ministry of AYUSH, being the Nodal Ministry of the Central Government qua all matters pertaining to Indian Medicine, sought permission to increase the intake capacity in the Undergraduate Course of BAMS, from 50 to 100 students annually, from the Academic Session 2019-2020; (ii) that the respondent No. 1 Ministry of AYUSH, on 20th November, 2018, forwarded the said application of the appellant College to the respondent No.2 Central Council of Indian Medicine (CCIM), a regulatory body for institutions/colleges imparting education in various disciplines in Indian Medicines in India, for the purposes of inspection etc.; (iii) that a team from respondent No.2 CCIM visited the appellant College on 14th February, 2019 for inspection of the teaching and infrastructure facilities; (iv) that the respondent No.2 CCIM submitted its report dated 9th April, 2019 to the respondent No. 1 Ministry of AYUSH, recommending denial of increase in admission capacity to the appellant College; (v) that the respondent No.1 Ministry of AYUSH issued a notice dated 3rd May, 2019 to the appellant College, to show cause why enhancement in admissions should not be denied, for the reasons set out in the said notice and to appear before the designated Hearing Committee on 8th May, 2019; (vi) that the appellant College participated in the hearing pursuant to the notice to show cause; (vii) that though the respondent No.1 Ministry of AYUSH ought to have given its decision on the proposal of the appellant College for enhancement of admission capacity from the Academic Session 2019-2020, on or before 31st May, 2019, but failed to do so; (viii) that the Central Government, on 11th July, 2019, notified the Establishment o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top