SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIKAS MAHAJAN
Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vikas Mahajan, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.53860/2022

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 16995/20022

2. Issue notice. Mr T. Singhdev, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 3, Mr Aravindh S., learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 and Mr Vivekanand Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4, accept notice.

3. The petitioner-college's challenge in the present writ petition is to the following three orders:

(i) Order dated 28.09.2022 passed by the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) of the National Medical Commission, whereby the petitioner's application for increase of 100 MBBS seats from 150 to 250 for the academic year 2022-2023, has been disapproved;

(ii) Order dated 28.11.2022 passed by the National Medical Commission in the appeal, whereby the Appeal Committee unanimously decided not to increase the number of seats of the petitioner-college for the academic year 2022-2023; and

(iii) Order dated 07.12.2022, whereby the second appeal for increase of MBBS seats from 150 to 250 seats preferred by the petitioner before the Central Government was dismissed.

4. The petitioner-medical college had submitted an applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top