Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College vs National Medical Commission

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIKAS MAHAJAN
Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission – Respondent

Table of Content
1. challenge to orders regarding mbbs seat increase (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments regarding validity of inspection and compliance (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
3. counterarguments against petitioner's claims (Para 17 , 18)
4. analysis of extension of future compliance to current application (Para 19 , 20)
5. decision based on deficiencies reported in inspections (Para 27 , 28 , 30)

JUDGMENT

Vikas Mahajan, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.53860/2022

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 16995/20022

2. Issue notice. Mr T. Singhdev, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 3, Mr Aravindh S., learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 and Mr Vivekanand Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4, accept notice.

3. The petitioner-college's challenge in the present writ petition is to the following three orders:

(i) Order dated 28.09.2022 passed by the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) of the National Medical Commission, whereby the petitioner's application for increase of 100 MBBS seats from 150 to 250 for the academic year 2022-2023, has been disapproved;

(ii) Order dated 28.11.2022 passed by the National Medical Commission in the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTVIKAS MAHAJANSri Venkateshwaraa Medical College – AppellantVersusNational Medical Commission – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIKAS MAHAJAN
Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission – Respondent