Veena Devi vs Praveen Kumar Gupta

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Veena Devi – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar Gupta – Respondent

Table of Content
1. parties' claims regarding property ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. trial court's decisions on injunction and possession. (Para 4 , 11 , 14)
3. issues regarding the defendants' claims of dispossession. (Para 9 , 10)
4. legal arguments on inherent powers and restitution. (Para 17 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. substantial questions of law regarding appealability. (Para 22 , 24)
6. final orders and directions regarding possession. (Para 39 , 43 , 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT

1. This Regular Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 read with Order 42 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `CPC') against the impugned judgment dated 06.05.2019 whereby the appeal of the Appellants against the judgment and decree dated 24.09.2018 in Suit No. 607578/2016 has been dismissed.

2. Brief and relevant facts necessary for adjudication of the appeal are that Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein/Plaintiffs in the Suit, being the sons of Late Shri Shankar Lal and Smt. Veena Devi, instituted a Suit for permanent injunction against their parents. Late Shri Shankar Lal was Defendant No. 1 and Smt. Veena Devi was Defendant No. 2. The suit was filed to restrain the Defendants from dispo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJYOTI SINGHVeena Devi – AppellantVersusPraveen Kumar Gupta – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Veena Devi – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar Gupta – Respondent