SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Veena Devi – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar Gupta – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Regular Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 read with Order 42 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `CPC') against the impugned judgment dated 06.05.2019 whereby the appeal of the Appellants against the judgment and decree dated 24.09.2018 in Suit No. 607578/2016 has been dismissed.

2. Brief and relevant facts necessary for adjudication of the appeal are that Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein/Plaintiffs in the Suit, being the sons of Late Shri Shankar Lal and Smt. Veena Devi, instituted a Suit for permanent injunction against their parents. Late Shri Shankar Lal was Defendant No. 1 and Smt. Veena Devi was Defendant No. 2. The suit was filed to restrain the Defendants from dispossessing them from shop No. 5308, Shora Kothi, Paharganj, New Delhi (suit property). It was alleged that (a) the Plaintiffs were carrying out their business from the suit property at the time of institution of the suit; (b) Plaintiff No. 1 was carrying on business of catering for the last 12 years and his goods and other catering material were lying in the suit property; (c) Plaintiff No. 2 was carrying on business of tent/decorators and furniture for a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top