Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Dhiraj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims entitlement to pro rata pension. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents acknowledge conditions for pension. (Para 3) |
| 3. court orders verification and potential payment. (Para 4) |
| 4. interest on unpaid pension arrears specified. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 11000/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 3628/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
W.P. (C) 3628/2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
