SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
CPL Roni Sen - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 2695 of 2021
Decided On : 26-02-2021




The court directed the payment of pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly situated as in prior decisions, establishing the principle of equality and fair treatment under law.

Headnote:(A) The Constitution of India - Right to Equality - Subject matter of pro rata pension claims - Petition disposed of with directions for the payment of arrears of pro rata pension. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Judicial Review - Principle of Directive Relief - Respondents directed to grant relief akin to that afforded in previous judgments unless justified otherwise post-verification. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claims pro rata pension on grounds of being similarly situated as in prior cases. Respondents acknowledged the validity of required No Objection Certificates.

Findings of Court:
Respondents must verify the petitioner's eligibility within twelve weeks, providing written reasons if entitlement is denied. Interest on late payments set at 7% per annum.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is similarly placed as petitioners in prior decisions and entitled to pro rata pension.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that if verified to be as entitled, the petitioner shall receive arrears due and future payments.

Result: Petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. video conferencing for hearings. (Para 1)
2. claim for similar reliefs as previous cases. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondents agree to dispose of the petition. (Para 4)
4. direction to grant pro rata pension if eligible. (Para 5)
5. interest on arrears and order upload. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):

CM APPL. 7982/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 2695/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.

W.P. (C) 2695/2021

1. These petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner within a week.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top