Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to dismissal of the petitioner (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the petitioner's circumstances and dismissal (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on delay and merits (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. dismissal of the petition (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the dismissal order dated 06th October, 2004 passed by the Commandant 33 BN BSF, the order dated 25th May, 2007 passed by the DG BSF, New Delhi and the order dated 31st January, 2017 passed by the IG (PSO) FTR HQ BSF Jammu, whereby the Petitioner's petition for reinstatement was rejected.
2. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner in service with all consequential benefits.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner was granted fifteen days casual leave from 28th May, 2004 to 15th June, 2004, since the Petitioner's mother met with an accident and subsequently the Petitioner left for Tundla. He states that though the Petitioner's mother was discharged from the hospital on 04th May 2006, yet her mental condition was not stable and subsequently, the Petitioner took her to th
Dismissal from service without trial is permissible under the BSF Act when due process is deemed followed, and claims for medical reasons must be substantiated with contemporaneous records.
Dismissal from service upheld due to prolonged unauthorized absence and insufficient justification for the leave; reinstatement denied as the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory communication ....
The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner from service, finding the punishment proportionate to the gravity of his repeated misconduct and not warranting judicial intervention.
The court's decision was influenced by the principle that the punishment awarded should be commensurate with the gravity of the offences, and the court should not interfere in writ jurisdiction if th....
Delay in filing a writ petition can result in dismissal, as equitable relief may be denied based on the principles of delay and laches, emphasizing the need for timely legal action.
A member of Central Armed Police Forces is obligated to report back to duty timely, as absence without leave can justify removal from service regardless of personal circumstances.
The court established that an employee's failure to attend disciplinary proceedings and provide credible medical evidence can justify dismissal from service.
Dismissal from service upheld as lawful under the BSF Act due to unauthorized absence and lack of due process claims by the petitioner.
The obligation to report for duty is paramount; without sufficient proof of personal hardships, a member's unauthorized absence justifies dismissal under the BSF Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of discipline in the Border Security Force, the adherence to the BSF Act and Rules in dismissal proceedings, and the limited scope f....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
