Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
D.N. Patel, Jasmeet Singh, JJ.
Nyaya Manch (NGO) - Appellant
Versus
Chairman State Task Force (STF) - Respondent
W.P.(C) 10704 of 2020 & CM Appl. 5869 of 2021
Decided On : 25-03-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. public interest litigation seeks demolition of illegal structures. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's inability to join shop owners affects case. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court mandates hearing of owners before demolition. (Para 4) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed without joining necessary parties. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)--This so-called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:
"a) Direct the respondents to demolish the said unauthorized and illegal construction and encroachment at Mohan Singh Market, Sector-6, R.K.Puram, New Delhi and Sector-8, R.K. Puram, New Delhi and also encroachment on government land to Main Market of Sector-6, R.K.Puram, New Delhi there is about 50 shops/platforms which consisting illegal and unauthorized construction and encroachment of government land at Mohan Singh Market, Sector-6, R.K. Puram, New Delhi;
b) Direct the respondents to remove the encroachments/unauthorized construction on the Government road/street of public utility;
c) Pass any other order/s relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice."
2. Having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that this petitioner is in search of demolition of as many as 50 shops at Mohan Singh Market, Sector-6, R.K. Puram, New Delhi.
3. It appears that the concerned shop owners have not been joined as respondents. In the absence of these shop owners, petitioner is searching for the order of demolition to be initiated by the respondents.
4. Hence, we see no reason to entertain this writ petition without joining the owners/occupiers as respondents for the construction to be demolished. No construction can be ordered to be demolished by the Court without hearing owners/occupiers of the construction.
5. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. The pending application also stands disposed of.
Demolition of unauthorized constructions requires due process, including the right to be heard for affected owners/occupiers.
Public interest litigation is not applicable when targeting a specific property owned by an individual, and separate legal actions must be pursued for such disputes.
Public Interest Litigation requires proper standing and evidence; a petitioner must join affected parties and cannot solely rely on hearsay.
A genuine public interest litigation requires the presence of necessary parties and substantial evidence to support claims of encroachment or illegality.
Lack of evidence, ground work, and public interest element in a public interest litigation may lead to the dismissal of the petition and imposition of costs on the petitioner.
A public interest litigation must be substantiated with credible evidence and involve necessary parties; failure to do so may result in dismissal.
Writ jurisdiction cannot adjudicate factual disputes; grievances should be treated as representations for resolution by appropriate authorities under relevant laws.
Writ jurisdiction is not suitable for adjudicating disputed questions of fact regarding legality of construction; appropriate remedies must be pursued instead.
The court directs administrative authorities to expedite action on illegal encroachments on public land while emphasizing public interest.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
