Rakesh Katyal vs Uma Pati Sood

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JAYANT NATH
Rakesh Katyal – Appellant
Versus
Uma Pati Sood – Respondent

Table of Content
1. plaintiff seeks partition of property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. defendant raises objections regarding ownership and prior agreements. (Para 4 , 5 , 10)
3. court discusses legal implications of consent decree. (Para 6 , 11 , 12 , 14)
4. court analyzes collaboration agreement and sale deed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. court affirms rights in properties based on valid deeds. (Para 13 , 15)
6. court orders appointment of local commissioner for property partition. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Jayant Nath, J. (Oral)--This suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of partition of property No. D-2/7, Janak Puri, New Delhi measuring 351 sq. mtrs declaring the share of the plaintiff as one fourth share.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that late Shri Jagan Nath Sood became the owner of the freehold land measuring 351 sq mtrs bearing No. 7, Block - D2, Janak Puri, New Delhi vide the conveyance deed dated 28.06.2002. On 23.03.2007 Shri Jagan Nath Sood died intestate leaving behind four legal heirs including defendant No.1 his son/Uma Pati Sood and another son Shri Rama Pati Sood and two daughters. His wife expired in 2007. On 23.02.2013 the two daughters relinquished

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJAYANT NATHRakesh Katyal – AppellantVersusUma Pati Sood – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JAYANT NATH
Rakesh Katyal – Appellant
Versus
Uma Pati Sood – Respondent