SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 53

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Mohamad Ansari – Appellant
Versus
Md. Hasan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Manjul Prasad.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.T. Sajid, Mr. Saibal Mitra.

JUDGMENT :

[Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.]

1. Heard.

2. This second appeal has been filed being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 03.10.2013 (decree sealed and signed on 18.11.2013) passed by the learned District Judge No. II, Palamau at Daltonganj in Title Appeal No. 03 of 1997 affirming the judgment and decree dated 19.12.1996 (decree sealed and signed on 10.01.1997) passed by the learned 2nd Additional Munsif, Daltonganj in Title Suit No. 53 of 1992.

3. Title Suit No. 53 of 1992 was instituted by the appellants/plaintiff for declaration of plaintiff's valid title and possession over the suit properties by virtue of registered deed of Baimokasa being deed no. 1175 dated 02.03.1987 executed by the proforma defendant no. 3 namely Sheikh Mohammad Rasul and for other relief which the plaintiff be entitled with cost of the suit. The learned trial court after appreciating the evidence, dismissed the said title suit. Aggrieved with that judgment, the appellants/plaintiff preferred Title Appeal No. 03 of 1997 which was dismissed by the learned District Judge-II, Palamau at Daltonganj vide judgment dated 03.10.2013 affirming the judgment passed by the learned trial cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top