Ram Surat Singh vs Director General CISF

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Ram Surat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Director General CISF – Respondent

Table of Content
1. challenge to reduction of hra. (Para 1 , 2)
2. cisf members eligible for family accommodations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. compliance with office order for hra. (Para 6 , 7)
4. previous judgments affirming full hra. (Para 8 , 9)
5. orders for payment of hra and allowances. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petitions have been filed challenging the order dated 31st August 2017 issued by the Respondents whereby the HRA given to the Petitioners, was reduced. Petitioners seek directions to the Respondents to grant and pay the balance 5% HRA from June 2018 to November 2019 along with TPT (transport allowance) for the said period together with 18% interest from the date it become due and payable till the date of payment.

2. Petitioner in W.P. (C) No.4149/2021 also seeks direction to the Respondents to grant full TA & DA which is applicable to family members on transfer from one unit to another.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners are members of CISF who were not provided with family accommodation by the Respondents while they were posted in CISF Unit at IGI Airport, New Delhi. He further states that since the family accommodati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTMANMOHAN, ASHA MENONRam Surat Singh – AppellantVersusDirector General CISF – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Ram Surat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Director General CISF – Respondent