SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Mohammed Isham – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. final disposition and directives for payment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 12)
2. challenge to hra denial and claim for arrears. (Para 4)
3. arguments for entitlement to full hra under rules. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's reasoning based on prior judgments. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

Present matter has been heard by way of video conferencing.

C.M.No.663/2022

1. Present application has been filed for enlargement of time for filing of counter-affidavit on behalf of the respondents. Even on the last date of hearing, this Court was not inclined to grant time to the respondents to file a counter-affidavit, as the matter was squarely covered by a decision of this Court in Surender Pal Singh vs. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Home & Ors., W.P.(C) No.9853/2021.

2. Consequently, the prayer for additional time to file the counter-affidavit is declined.

3. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

W.P.(C) No.13442/2021

4. It is pertinent to mention that the present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 26th October 2017 vide which request of Petitioner for grant of HRA/allotment of family accommodation was declined. Petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top