SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Pramod Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's claims for pay revision. (Para 1)
2. precedent established by previous court ruling. (Para 2)
3. court's decision to align with precedent. (Para 5)
4. entitlement to benefits under revised pay rules. (Para 6)
5. final disposition of the petition. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 8109/2021

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, present application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2726/2021

1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

    "(a) To issue a writ of mandamus or any such order for declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in fixing the basic pay scale of the Petitioner @ Rs.9300/+ Rs.4200/- Grade Pay while granting 2nd ACP benefit w.e.f. the date when he completed 24 years of his regular service, as illegal and arbitrary;

    (b) To issue a writ of mandamus or any such order for directing the Respondent No. 2 to 4 to fix/revise/correction of basic pay scale of the Petitioner @ Rs.5500* 1.86 = 10230/- + Rs.4200/- Grade Pay from the date of completion of 24 years of his service while granting him the benefit of 2nd ACP financial benefit;

    (c) To direct the Respondent No. 2 to 4 to give the respective

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top