SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Pramod Singh Yadav - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2726 of 2021
Decided On : 06-04-2021




The court emphasized the need for consistent application of benefits under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, reaffirming entitlements based on prior rulings in similar cases.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 - Clause (i) of Rule 7(1)(A) - Writ petition for revising pay scale - Petitioner claimed additional pay benefits after completing 24 years of service, asserting the arbitrary nature of the fixed salary - Court referenced a prior judgment establishing similar entitlements. (Paras 1, 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to declare the pay fixation as arbitrary and requested a re-evaluation of his basic pay scale and corresponding arrears based on his years of service and entitlement to 2nd ACP benefits.

Findings of Court:
The court directed that the petitioner is entitled to pay benefits aligned with previous judgment, ensuring compliance within four months, with interest applicable for delays.

Issues: The main question was the legality and fairness of the pay scale determination based on service duration and benefits entitlement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that similar cases already adjudicated should maintain consistency in the application of rules, notably highlighting the Central Civil Services rules to ensure favorable treatment for the petitioner.

Result: Petition allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claims for pay revision. (Para 1)
2. precedent established by previous court ruling. (Para 2)
3. court's decision to align with precedent. (Para 5)
4. entitlement to benefits under revised pay rules. (Para 6)
5. final disposition of the petition. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 8109/2021

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, present application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2726/2021

1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

    "(a) To issue a writ of mandamus or any such order for declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in fixing the basic pay scale of the Petitioner @ Rs.9300/+ Rs.4200/- Grade Pay while granting 2nd ACP benefit w.e.f. the date when he completed 24 years of his regular service, as illegal and arbitrary;

    (b) To issue a writ of mandamus or any such order for directing the Respondent No. 2 to 4 to fix/revise/correction of basic pay scale of the Petitioner @ Rs.5500* 1.86 = 10230/- + Rs.4200/- Grade Pay from the date of completion of 24 years of his service while granting him the benefit of 2nd ACP financial benefit;

    (c) To direct the Respondent No. 2 to 4 to give the respective arrears to the petitioner along with his pension after re-fixation of his basic pay scale @ Rs.5500/- * 1.86 = Rs.10230/- + Rs.4200/- G.P. from the date of completion of 24 years in service while granting him the benefit of 2nd ACP along with subsequent consequential benefits arising there from;

    (d) Any other relief/order/direction as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue involved in the matter is covered by the judgement of this Court in Jas Ram & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., WP(C) 332/2017 decided on 12th January, 2018.

3. On the last two dates of hearing, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 had taken time to obtain instructions.

4. Today, Mr. Ramniranjan, Pairvi Officer, CRFP states that the petitioner's case is still under process.

5. Having regard to the fact that a Coordinate Bench has already examined the issue at hand and decided the same in favour of the petitioners therein who are similarly situated placed as that of the petitioner in the present petition, we propose to allow the present petition on the same line, as decided vide judgement dated 12th January, 2018 in Jas Ram & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (supra).

6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by holding that the petitioner herein shall be entitled to the benefit of clause (i) appended to Rule 7(1)(A) of the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules 2008 wherever it is more beneficial. Necessary compliance shall be made by the respondents within four months from today. In the event, compliance is made beyond the period granted above, the respondents shall pay simple interest @ 8% per annum to the petitioner from the date of passing of the order, till the payment is released.

7. Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top