Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Amit Hansda - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4199 of 2021 & C.M. Nos. 12760-12761 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4212 of 2021 & C.M. Nos. 12801-12802 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 4267 of 2021 & C.M. Nos. 12978-12979 of 2021
Decided On : 06-04-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to termination and pending appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petitions treated as statutory appeals. (Para 3) |
| 3. direction for decision by deputy inspector. (Para 4) |
| 4. clarification on court's stance and rights. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. disposal of writ petitions and applications. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petitions have been filed challenging the Show Cause Notice dated 15th July 2019 as well as the termination order dated 18th March 2021 passed by the Respondents. Petitioners seek reinstatement in service w.e.f. 02nd April 2021 with all consequential benefits and relaxation by the Respondents by treating the Petitioners as having completed basic training and declaring the Petitioners entitled to all consequential benefits including confirmation.
2. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the Petitioners have filed statutory appeals against the impugned termination order. However, the same have not been decided till date.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the statutory appeals that had been filed do not contain all the grounds. He prays that the present writ petitions be treated as statutory appeals of the Petitioners and a direction be issued to the Deputy Inspector General, Sector Headquarters (Special Campaign), Gaya to decide the same by way of a reasoned order.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are directed to be treated as statutory appeals and the Deputy Inspector General, Sector Headquarters (Special Campaign), Gaya is directed to decide the same by way of a reasoned order within two weeks.
5. Learned counsel for the Petitioners is directed to serve copies of the present writ petitions upon Deputy Inspector General, Sector Headquarters (Special Campaign), Gaya through e-mail by tomorrow.
6. This Court clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. All the rights and contentions of the parties are left open.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of.
Writ petitions may be treated as statutory appeals, and authorities must resolve pending statutory appeals fairly and promptly.
The court clarified that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy, leaving all rights and contentions of the parties open.
Writ petitions cannot challenge show cause notices as premature; effective statutory remedies under Rule 29 of the Sashastra Seema Bal Rules should be pursued first.
A third writ petition on the same cause of action is barred under public policy when earlier petitions were withdrawn without permission, reflecting principles of judicial efficiency and discouraging....
Compliance with the Writ Court's order for reinstatement led to the closure of the contempt petition.
The court considered the modification of the writ court's order in appeal and the subsequent actions taken by the respondents to determine compliance with the court order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
