Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Sushil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request to restrain bid process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's claim for license extension. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. respondents argue against extension. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 4. assessment of parking site's value by respondents. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's reasoning on extension refusal. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 13944/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4547/2021 & CM APPL. 13943/2021
1. Issue notice. Ms. Pushkarna accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. We have heard learned counsels at some length. At this stage itself, we proceed to dispose of the present writ petition.
3. The petitioner has preferred this petition to restrain the respondents from proceeding to call for bids in respect of the parking site for Car/Two Wheelers/Three Wheelers near Ruby Taxi Stand at Distt. Centre, Rajendra place vide e-tender dated 16.03.2021, NO. DC/RP CELL/NDMC/2021/D 539 and Corrigendum/addendum dated 26.03.2021, No. DC/RP CELL I NDMC/2021/D-601 listed at Item No. 75 of the Tender List.
4. The case of the petitioner is that the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
