IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI, SAVITRI RATHO
Jibandhara – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
B.R. SARANGI, J.
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the Tender Call Notice dated 26/27.11.2020 under Annexure-9 series; and to direct the opposite parties to approve the extension of the appointment of the petitioner for a further period of two years, i.e. from 03.01.2021 to 02.01.2023 as per the terms of contract, in view of the recommendation made by opposite party no.3 on 27.10.2020 under Annexure-6; and to direct opposite party no.3 to release the arrear dues of Rs.1,40,00,000/- along with subsequent pending dues of the petitioner forthwith.
2. The factual matrix of the case, in brief, is that opposite party no.3 floated an e-tender call notice on 08.08.2016 for empanelment of Chemists for CGHS for three years, i.e. 2016-2019 with the terms and conditions specified therein. The petitioner participated in the tender process and became successful. Accordingly, the petitioner executed the agreement for a period of one year on 03.11.2016. But subsequently the said agreement was renewed on 02.11.2017 and 02.11.2018 for one year extension in each spell. Another advertisement was
M/s. Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others
West Bengal Electricity Board v. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd and others
Central Coalfields Ltd and another v. SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium) and others
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. The International Airport Authority of India and others
Roots Industries India Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.