Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Aaftaab Singh Bhamrah – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of disputes leading to quashing of fir (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's inclination to quash fir based on facts (Para 8) |
| 3. quashing of fir due to lack of prosecution (Para 9) |
| 4. final order allowing the petition (Para 10) |
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.497/2020 dated 15.11.2020, registered at PS - Kapashera, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
5. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and he has been identified by SI Vivak/IO and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
6. Petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understandin
In cases of amicable settlement, a victim's non-objection to prosecution can justify quashing an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Amicable settlements in criminal matters can lead to the quashing of FIRs if all parties consent and further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The High Court possesses the inherent power to quash FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
When disputes between parties are amicably settled, and the aggrieved party consents, criminal proceedings may be quashed for lack of utility.
FIR can be quashed when parties reach an amicable settlement and no further prosecution is warranted.
The court retains the authority to quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes, preventing the abuse of the judicial process.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
A court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties have reached an amicable settlement and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court recognized the validity of amicable settlements in criminal cases, allowing for the quashing of FIRs when both parties agree to discontinue prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
