SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Rajesh Karnani – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. final order allows quashing of fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 10 , 11)
2. settled disputes can lead to quashing fir. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court considers presence and wishes of parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 9)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CRL. M.A. 5493/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.1075/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 329/2020 dated 08.09.2020, registered at PS - Gandhi Nagar, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and she has been identified by ASI Sanjeev Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8. Petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and rela

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top