SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Savita Jain Sole Proprietor of Ms Navkar Sales – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Packaging – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and order (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding admitted liability and urgency (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. financial condition and balance sheet assertions (Para 3 , 11 , 13)
4. judicial discretion and principles for section 9 (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
5. appellant's protection regarding admitted amount (Para 14)
6. final order directing bank guarantee (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.

CM APPL. 8706/2021

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 8705/2021

Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in filing the present appeal is condoned.

Accordingly, the application stands allowed.

FAO (COMM) 62/2021 & CM APPL. 8704/2021

1. Present appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 26th November, 2020 passed in OMP (I) (Comm.) No. 119/2020 (hereinafter referred to as `the impugned order') whereby the petition filed by the appellant/petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act, 1996') was dismissed with costs.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT

2. Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner stated that the respondent had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top