Hassad Food Company Q.S.C. vs Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Hassad Food Company Q.S.C. – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited – Respondent

Table of Content
1. overview of reliefs sought by the petitioner (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. procedural history of appeals and orders (Para 4 , 6 , 8 , 10)
3. previous court decisions affecting the case (Para 5 , 7 , 11 , 12)
4. scope of judicial review and pre-deposit requirement (Para 15 , 16 , 19)
5. discussion on merits and jurisdictional issues (Para 18)
6. final judgement and dismissal of the petition (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner to seek the following reliefs:

"(a) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, to set aside the impugned Judgment dated 06.05.2019 passed by DRT II in OA No 347/2014;

(b) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, to set aside the lmpugned Recovery Certificate No. 246/2019 dated 15.05.2019 passed by DRT II in OA No.347/2014;

(c) Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, to set aside all subsequent or consequential orders, by the Hon'ble DRAT (including presently orders dated 07.08.2019,11.10.20 19 and 18.02.2020) ;

(d) Alternatively, remand the matter back to DRT-II for a fresh determination of O.A No. 347/2014 titled Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTVIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLIHassad Food Company Q.S.C. – AppellantVersusReliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, REKHA PALLI
Hassad Food Company Q.S.C. – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited – Respondent