SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Hira Sweets & Confectionary Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Hira Confectioners – Respondent


Table of Content
1. applications for setting aside ex-parte judgment. (Para 1 , 4)
2. overview of plaintiff's claims and defendant's situation. (Para 2 , 6)
3. court's reason for original ex-parte ruling. (Para 3 , 5 , 10)
4. citations supporting both parties' positions. (Para 7 , 9)
5. criteria for 'sufficient cause' under order ix rule 13 cpc. (Para 11 , 12)
6. interpretation of sufficient cause in case law. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
7. defendant's failure to demonstrate sufficient cause. (Para 16 , 18)
8. court's decision on the lack of sufficient cause. (Para 20 , 21)
9. conclusion and dismissal of applications. (Para 22 , 24)

JUDGMENT

I.A. 9702/2020 (Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC by the Defendant) & I.A. 9703/2020 (Condonation of Delay of 582 days in filing I.A. 9702/2020 by the Defendant)

1. The present applications have been preferred by the defendant through its proprietor - Pooja Sharma seeking setting aside of the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 01.02.2019 as well as for seeking condonation of delay of 582 days in filing the application.

2. Briefly, the present suit was filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement and passing off of trademark, copyright, damages, delivery up

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top