Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
J.M.J. Signage – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition against labor court award highlighted incorrect name. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's employment claims and procedural history outlined. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. labor court's proceedings and evidence noted. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. parties' arguments regarding withdrawal and merit addressed. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's reasoning on merits and procedural aspects discussed. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. court sets aside award; petitioner's rights to seek remedy reaffirmed. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
[Judgement pronounced via videoconferencing on account of COVID-19]
Rajiv Shakdher, J.
Table of Contents
Preface:
Background facts:
Submissions on behalf of the parties:
Reasons and Analysis:
Conclusion:
Preface:-
1. This writ petition is directed against the award dated 12.02.2018 passed by the concerned labour court in LIR No. 3538/17. The principal grievance of the petitioner is, that the labour court has ruled on the reference made to it, although, he had made a plea for withdrawing the reference.
2. The record shows that the petitioner advanced the plea for withdrawing the reference on two grounds.
2.1 First, that his name had been wrongly recorded as "Rak
The court ruled that under the Industrial Disputes Act, the petitioner could withdraw an improperly referenced case to ensure due process, affirming the need for correct identification in legal proce....
The ad judicatory authorities under the Industrial Disputes Act are not bound by the technical rules of procedure as in civil actions.
Delay in filing a reference does not preclude adjudication on merits, especially when the dispute remains alive.
A stale industrial dispute cannot be maintained; the workman must demonstrate that the dispute remains alive despite delays, as established in Prabhakar v. Joint Director.
A significant delay in raising an industrial dispute can render it stale, even in the absence of a statutory limitation period.
Point of Law - There is no embargo on the writ Court to quash a wholly inappropriate or undesirable or invalid reference order, in case no industrial dispute exists.
It is again on issue of delay where there is no express provision for it. Whereas, in the present case, there is express provision providing limitation to prefer a Reference / claim before the Labour....
The absence of a prescribed time limit for making a reference to the Labour Court should be considered in conjunction with general principles of delay and laches, and the plea of delay, if raised by ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act can only be considered a dispute if a specific demand has been made by the workmen, and any refere....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
