IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Zahid @ Mohd. Jahid - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 278 of 2021
Decided On : 28-04-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of case facts leading to bail application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court observations on evidence and implications. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments regarding false implication and prior cases. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. final ruling on bail application. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J. This petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 215/2019, dated 05.08.2019 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi, for offences punishable under sections 324, 307, 452 and 324 IPC.
2. Brief facts of the present case are as under:
a. On 05.08.2019, A PCR call was received at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, which was recorded vide DD No.02-A at 03:50 AM. It reads as under:
"H.No. 9/4481, Gali No.06, Ajeet Nagar caller bol raha hai ki mere bhai ko chaku mar diya"
b. The IO contacted the complainant who identified himself as one Sadiq Hussain. The IO went to the given address. The complainant told the IO that he is taking his brother Jakir and nephew Tahir to GTB Hospital.
c. On investigation it was revealed that Jakir and Tahir were stabbed. A knife was recovered and was taken into custody.
d. MLC of Tahir Hussain bearing No. A/8526/26/19 and of Jakir Hussain bearing MLC No. A8628/26/1 were collected by the IO. The MLC of Tahir revealed that he had received total 8 injuries on stomach, chest, forehead and thigh and the MLC of Jakir revealed that he received two injuries on shoulder and chest.
e. The IO recorded the statement of Jakir under Section 161 Cr.P.C. In his statement, Jakir stated that he and his son Tahir Hussain reside at H.No. 9/4481, Gali No.06, Ajeet Nagar, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi for the last seven years and they run a factory on the first floor of the said premises. He stated that at about 03:30 AM, he woke up due to a noise and he saw an unknown person in the room. It is stated that on seeing the unknown person he and his son tried to grab the unknown person but the person took out a knife and stabbed both of them and escaped. It is stated that the brother of Jakir i.e. Sadiq called the Police and took both the injured/victims to the GTB Hospital.
f. A case under Section 307 IPC was registered vide FIR No.215/2019. Material on record reveals that on 23.11.2019 in FIR No.361/19, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi for offences under Sections 392/397 IPC, the accused/petitioner herein i.e. Mohd. Jahid was arrested. During interrogation he revealed that he committed the offence in the present case also.
g. After the disclosure, the petitioner was arrested on 24.11.2019 in the present case and an application for Test Identification Parade (TIP) was filed, however, the petitioner refused to participate in TIP proceeding stating that his identity has already been revealed to the complainant.
h. The final opinion on the MLCs was obtained and the injuries suffered by Tahir were shown as Grevious.
i. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 27.01.2020 for offences under Sections 307 , 324, 452 and 324 IPC.
j. The petitioner thereafter filed an application for grant of bail which was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, (SFTC) East, Karkardooma Courts by an order dated 30.06.2020.
k. Another application for bail was also filed by the petitioner which has also been dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 15.01.2021.
l. The petitioner approached this Court for grant of regular bail by filing the present petition.
3. Status Report has been filed. The status report states that the petitioner had previously been involved in many cases of theft, snatching and robbery and there are total 19 cases registered against him.
4. Mr. Firoz Iqbal Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner would state that when the petitioner was arrested in FIR No.361/19, at that point of time the report showed that the petitioner was involved only in two cases which were FIR No. 601/15 Police Station, Daryaganj where th
The court denied bail based on the severity of the alleged offense and the presence of sufficient evidence to confirm the accused's involvement.
The court may grant bail based on the duration of custody and the submission of a charge sheet, despite the prosecution's claims of habitual offending.
In serious criminal offenses, bail may be denied due to the risk of tampering with evidence and potential witness intimidation, especially when substantial evidence exists against the accused.
Bail applications for serious offenses can be denied to prevent witness tampering, balancing individual liberty against public safety.
The court granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. due to the petitioner's lengthy custody, lack of prior naming in the FIR, and completion of investigation, while ensuring witness safety.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the nature and gravity of the offence, along with the potential for influencing witnesses and tampering with evidence, are crucial factors in ....
A bail application may be granted when the accused has been in custody for an extended period, all witnesses have been examined, and there is no threat of evidence tampering.
Point of Law : Criminal Law - Offence of Murder - Bail Application - petitioner has spent nearly eight years in the prison, all the prosecution witnesses have been examined - Court is inclined to gra....
The court denied bail based on the seriousness of the murder charge, evidence from eyewitnesses, and the petitioner's history of serious offenses necessitating careful consideration of potential witn....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.