Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Deepshree Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rishi Pratap Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis for the appeal and prior judgment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the compromise and decree. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondent's arguments on limitations and merits. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's reasoning on consent decree validity. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. analysis of appellant’s claims regarding prejudice. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. discussion on the nature of legal interests. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. court's reaffirmation of judicial responsibilities. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 8. final conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 26) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J.
CM APPL. 13954/2021
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
RFA(OS) 13/2021 & CM APPLs. 13952/2021, 13953/2021
1. The present case reflects the bane of the Indian judicial system, namely, that there is no finality attached to any judicial proceeding. Litigants think that they can `hop on and hop off the case' at any stage without any consequence using the slogan `pure justice'.
2. It is pertinent to mention that present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 18th November, 2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CS (OS) No 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
