Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Vijay Kumar Miglani – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties settled their disputes. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. notice issued and accepted by counsels. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court finds no purpose in prosecution. (Para 7) |
| 4. fir quashed based on amicable settlement. (Para 8) |
| 5. petition allowed and disposed of. (Para 9) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.812/2020, registered at PS - Mangolpuri, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
5. Respondent no.2 is personally present in Court through video conferencing with their counsel and she has been identified by SI Ramanuj/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
6. Petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amic
Amicable settlements between parties may warrant the quashing of FIRs when no further prosecution is desired, underscoring the judicial support for resolving disputes outside court.
An amicable settlement between parties is a valid ground to quash an FIR when no useful purpose would be served in pursuing prosecution.
Amicable settlement between parties allows for quashing of FIR if no useful purpose is served in prosecution.
A court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties have reached an amicable settlement and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can warrant quashing an FIR, prioritizing judicial efficiency when no further prosecution is deemed necessary.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties amicably settle their disputes, affirming the principle that prosecution continues only when necessary.
The court can quash an FIR if the parties involved amicably resolve their disputes, resulting in no beneficial purpose in continuing the prosecution.
The court ruled that an FIR can be quashed upon mutual settlement of disputes by the parties, emphasizing the role of amicable resolution in criminal matters.
The court can quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and the aggrieved party does not wish to pursue the matter further.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
