Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi at New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute settled; no prosecution desired. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. proceedings quashed due to resolution. (Para 9) |
| 3. fir quashed as no purpose in prosecution. (Para 10) |
| 4. petition allowed and disposed of. (Para 11 , 12) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
CRL. M.A. 2001/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.379/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.42/2021 dated 23.01.2021, registered at PS - Bawana, Delhi, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court through video conferencing and she has been identified by SI Jagbir/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
The court validated the quashing of an FIR based on the parties' amicable settlement, indicating that prosecution lacks utility when disputes are resolved.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties amicably settle their disputes, affirming the principle that prosecution continues only when necessary.
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainants express a desire not to proceed with prosecution.
The court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and do not wish to pursue prosecution, ensuring judicial efficiency.
The court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and do not wish to prosecute further, as continued prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties may warrant the quashing of FIRs when no further prosecution is desired, underscoring the judicial support for resolving disputes outside court.
An amicable settlement between parties is a valid ground to quash an FIR when no useful purpose would be served in pursuing prosecution.
Amicable settlements between parties can result in the quashing of FIRs when all parties express no desire to continue prosecution.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
