SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU
Kuber Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Doosan Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background about the contract and dispute between parties. (Para 2 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments presented by the petitioner regarding interdicting the bank guarantee. (Para 3 , 11 , 12 , 22 , 24 , 25)
3. court observations on the limited grounds for interdicting bank guarantees. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21)
4. final orders regarding the cheque and petition disposition. (Para 23 , 26)

JUDGMENT

[Hearing held through videoconferencing]

Vibhu Bakhru, J. (Oral)

IA Nos. 6495/2021, IA 6496/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 158/2021

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 (1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the `A&C Act'), inter alia, praying as under:

    "i) Direct the Respondent not to invoke and/or encash the Performance Bank Guarantees No. 003GT02180720033 of Rs.1,18,75,000/- dated 13.03.2018 till further orders;

    ii) Direct the Respondent not to encash the HDFC bank cheque bearing No. 000209 amounting to Rs.1,18,75,000/- till further orders;

    iii) Restrain the Respondent from taking any coercive steps against the Petitioner in relation to the Contract

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top