SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Neel Kamal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. The present writ petition impugns the order dated 4th May, 2021 of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, of dismissal of OA No. 1415/2020 preferred by the petitioner.

2. The petitioner herein was commissioned in Army Service Corps (ASC) of Indian Army on 15th December,1990 and since then has had an exemplary service record. The petitioner was promoted to the post of Brigadier in January, 2018. On 3rd March, 2021 respondents issued a list of names of the officers who are to be considered for promotion from the rank of Brigadier to Major General wherein petitioner's name was also included. As per Integrated HQ, of Ministry of Defence (Army) MS Branch, New Delhi letter No. 04502/MS Policy dated 23rd December 2017, the marks obtained in the Confidential Report (CR) are the most important aspect for promotion. Apprehending that his CRs for the periods January, 2018 to June, 2018 and July, 2018 to June, 2019 may not be good enough for him to be considered for promotion to the post of Major General, the petitioner made a Statutory Complaint on 19th November, 2019 to Ministry of Defence against his CRs earned in the rank of Brigadier for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top