SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 778

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AABI BINJU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. judgment pertains to a writ petition challenging adverse acrs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of acrs and contested years outline specific grievances. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. petitioner’s representations against acrs were rejected. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. tribunal’s decisions on acrs and references to prior judgments. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. issues involves the necessity of warning before acr grading. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. grading discrepancies highlighted in acrs for evaluation years. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
7. judicial examination of acr grading validity and necessity of reasons. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. standards for assessing acrs and procedural requirements outlined. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
9. judicial precedent concerning integrity and objectivity in acrs. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
10. final conclusions recognize acr gradings compatible with law. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)

JUDGMENT :

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. This writ petition assails judgment dated 12 September 2019, passed by the strative Tribunal [“the Tribunal” hereinafter] in seven Original Applications [OAs 4061/2014, 4518/2014, 4519/2014, 4532/2014, 4533/2014, 4623/2014 and 4625/2014

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top