DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rajesh Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. possession rights and history in property dispute. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 2. unregistered documents cannot confer title. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. claims based on unregistered documents have limited validity. (Para 11 , 15) |
| 4. ownership requires registered documentation as per legal standards. (Para 14 , 17) |
| 5. review petition dismissed; execution of decree permitted. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 17914/2021 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
CM APPL. 17913/2021 (for stay) in RSA 55/2007 and Review Petition 256/2019
3. The present application is for stay and suspension of the operation of judgment dated 13th March, 2015 passed in RSA 55/2007 titled Rajesh Kumar Pandey v. Shanti Devi & Anr..
4. The ground on which suspension is sought is that the Executing Court has passed an order on 5th April, 2021 that unless and until there is a stay on the order granted by this Court, the Court would proceed as per law. Thus, there is a likelihood of the suit property, being property No. 223/22-E, Gali No. 8, Railway Colony, Mandawali, Delhi-110092 (hereinaft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.