SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rajesh Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Devi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 17914/2021 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CM APPL. 17913/2021 (for stay) in RSA 55/2007 and Review Petition 256/2019

3. The present application is for stay and suspension of the operation of judgment dated 13th March, 2015 passed in RSA 55/2007 titled Rajesh Kumar Pandey v. Shanti Devi & Anr..

4. The ground on which suspension is sought is that the Executing Court has passed an order on 5th April, 2021 that unless and until there is a stay on the order granted by this Court, the Court would proceed as per law. Thus, there is a likelihood of the suit property, being property No. 223/22-E, Gali No. 8, Railway Colony, Mandawali, Delhi-110092 (hereinafter, "suit property"), being either disposed of, partitioned or sold as per the final judgment dated 13th March, 2015.

5. The Respondent is duly represented before the Court. The next date before the Executing Court is stated to be 16th June, 2021. Considering that the decree which was originally passed was dated 25th November, 2005 and the judgment passed by this Court, of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top