Siddharth Institute of Technology vs Pharmacy Council of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Siddharth Institute of Technology – Appellant
Versus
Pharmacy Council of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. recognition application for b.pharma course (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments about necessity of documents (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. court's analysis on document requirements (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. dismissal of petition (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

1. The petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondent/Pharmacy Council of India ["PCI"] to process its application dated 10.02.2021 for grant of recognition to its Bachelor of Pharmacy ["B.Pharma"] course for the academic year 2021-22. The petitioner has made an alternative prayer for a direction upon the respondent to provide a link to the petitioner for submission of its online application seeking recognition of the said course.

2. The petitioner is an established institution running a Diploma in Pharmacy ["D.Pharma"] course since 2016-17. It desired, in addition, to establish a B.Pharma course from the academic year 2021-22.

3. The case of the petitioner is that, pursuant to a public notice dated 30.12.2020, the PCI opened its portal for submission of approval applications for the academic year 202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTPRATEEK JALANSiddharth Institute of Technology – AppellantVersusPharmacy Council of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Siddharth Institute of Technology – Appellant
Versus
Pharmacy Council of India – Respondent