Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
P.A. Hashimon – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. orders regarding the applications and petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's transfer challenged based on health and family. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's direction for timely resolution of representations. (Para 6 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. conditions regarding compliance with the movement order. (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
ORDER
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
CM Nos.18410-11/2021 (both for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant Rules.
2. The applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5860/2021 & CM No.18409/2021 (for stay)
3. The petitioner, a Constable (General Duty) in the respondents Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and posted at Delhi since the year 2009, inspite of having lived in Delhi for the last more than eleven years, has filed this petition impugning the order dated 28th May, 2021 of his transfer to Chamera in Himachal Pradesh.
4. The transfer has been challenged on the grounds of, health of the petitioner and employment of the wife of the petitioner at Delhi, as a Nursing Officer in Ophthalmology Department of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi.
5. The counsel for the respondents CISF appears on advance notice and stat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
