SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Anu Malhotra, J.
Rajesh Lal - Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 2979 of 2020
Decided On : 14-06-2021




The court reinforced that a presumption under Section 113A must be drawn against a husband when a wife commits suicide within seven years of marriage, amid allegations of dowry harassment.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 304B, 498A - Application for bail in connection with the suicide of the applicant's spouse - Allegations of dowry demands and cruelty by the applicant - Court emphasized the need for a presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act in cases of suicide within seven years of marriage. (Paras 18-19)

(B) Burden of proof - The applicant claimed lack of evidence supporting charges of cruelty and dowry demand; however, the Court held that the conversation indicating threat and the surrounding circumstances could not be overlooked. (Paras 18-19)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, married to Maclina in October 2019, sought bail after being charged with her alleged dowry-related suicide in February 2020. The case centers on disagreements regarding Maclina's mental health and allegations of dowry harassment.

Findings of Court:
The Court found the allegations credible enough to deny bail, highlighting the legal presumption against the applicant due to the timing of the alleged suicide within the marriage.

Issues: The main issues were whether there was credible evidence of dowry demands and harassment, and the implications of Maclina's mental health on the suicide.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the allegations made by the family and the surrounding circumstances warranted a presumption of guilt under Section 113A, indicating the relationship between the applicant and Maclina was characterized by strain and potential maltreatment.

Result: Bail application declined.

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The applicant vide the present application has sought the grant of regular bail in relation to the FIR No.42/2020, PS Sonia Vihar, under Sections 304B/498A/34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860, which FIR is indicated to have been registered on 29.02.2020. The applicant is the spouse of the deceased and was married to her on 30.10.2019 at the Rosary Church Kingsway Camp, Delhi according to the Christian rites and ceremonies. The applicant contends that it was a simple marriage performed without any demand of dowry and that there was no dowry demand made by the applicant's side neither before the marriage nor after the marriage.

2. The applicant further submits that there was only a moderate gathering in the marriage. The applicant further submits that his spouse Maclina was suffering from a mental disorder namely somniloquy i.e. sleep talking disorder and she often used to scream during her sleep. The applicant further submits that the family of the deceased had not disclosed of this mental disease of the deceased to the applicant's family before the marriage of the applicant to Maclina (since deceased)

3. According to the applicant, because of the mental illness, Maclina was unable to behave normally and was reluctant to engage herself with the family members of the applicant and was unable to take part in post-marriage rituals and confined herself often in her room and was reluctant to come out despite requests of his family members. The applicant further submits that whenever he asked the deceased about the details and reasons for her disorder, she used to become angry and sometimes furious and sometimes used to throw household articles. The applicant further submits that he had made enquiries from the brother of the deceased Godson, who had told him that the deceased was suffering from depression and was taking the treatment from their family doctor before marriage. The applicant submits that on 07.11.2019, the complainant that is an apparent reference to the father of the deceased named Shri Jerome George, s/o Shri Max Well George visited the applicant's house on the request of the applicant and that the applicant and his mother had told the complainant about the unnatural behavior of Maclina, on which, the complainant i.e. the father of Maclina requested the applicant to send her to her parental home after every 15 days as she was suffering from depression. It is submitted by the applicant that the brother of the deceased had also asked the applicant to send the deceased to her parental home for getting treatment from their family doctor, to which, the applicant had said that he would take the deceased to some good hospital for treatment, to which, the brother of the deceased had however refused.

4. The applicant further submits that in the first week of December, 2019, Mr. Godson, the brother of the deceased had again taken back the deceased to her parental home for treatment and at that time, the applicant discussed/enquired from the deceased about her episode of panic and sleeping disorder again. The applicant submits that on 04.01.2020, there was a wedding of the applicant's relative but that the deceased refused to go for the same and that the applicant had dropped her at her parental home and that when the deceased was there, the brother of the deceased Mr. Godson had got her treated from a doctor named Dr.D.K. Gautam and when the deceased had come back, Mr. Godson had handed over the prescription related to the deceased to the applicant and had also handed over the additional medicines which the applicant had refused to administer to the deceased. The applicant submits that the medicines prescribed by Dr. Gautam were Vernol and Zapiz which are meant for depression and panic attacks. The copy of the prescription of Dr. DK Gautam was submitted by the applicant along with the application. It has been submitted through the application that around 26.01.2020, the deceased was feeling restle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top