SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Vivek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition challenging government order of appointment (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual basis for legal challenge provided (Para 5)
3. petitioners argue against powers of government to appoint (Para 6 , 9 , 10)
4. arguments about qualifications and appropriateness of appointee (Para 7 , 8 , 14)
5. counterarguments and assertions of authority discussed (Para 11 , 13)
6. doctrine of necessity invoked for appointment (Para 12 , 15)
7. decision to maintain democratic processes in council functioning (Para 18 , 19 , 21)
8. order for elections to be held for vice president (Para 22)

ORDER

C.M. No. 16529/2021 (for stay) in W.P.(C) 5355/2021

1. The present writ petition impugns Order dated 11th May, 2021 issued by the respondent no.1 (Government of India) by which respondent no.1 has asked the respondent no.3 (Dr. Ashok Khandelwal) to discharge the functions of President of the respondent no.2, Dental Council of India (council) with immediate effect. A further direction is sought to the respondent no.2 council to elect a Chairman of the respondent no.2 council through the process of circulation, as provided in Clauses 3 (5) and 8 of the Regulations of the Dental Council of India, 1956 (Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top