Dibyendu Mazumdar vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Dibyendu Mazumdar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. challenge to election process detailed (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. findings and recommendations of the report (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. petitioner's arguments on natural justice violations (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. respondents argue on jurisdiction and natural justice (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. jurisdiction matters and application of natural justice (Para 40 , 44 , 48)
6. court's observations on the committee process (Para 55 , 59 , 61)
7. final orders and remittance to uoi for reconsideration (Para 64 , 65 , 66)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order of the Union of India ["UOI"] dated 09.11.2020, by which his election to the post of the President of Respondent No. 2-Dental Council of India ["DCI"] was declared illegal and invalid, and the Vice-President was given charge as the President, DCI.

I. Facts

2. The petitioner is a dentist within the meaning of Section 2 (e) of the DENTISTS ACT , 1948 ["the Act"]. He was nominated as a member of the DCI by the State of West Bengal, under Section 3 (e) of the Act, in the year 2010. He wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTPRATEEK JALANDibyendu Mazumdar – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Dibyendu Mazumdar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent