SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Dibyendu Mazumdar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9053 of 2020 & CM Appls. 29197-29198 of 2020, 30451-30452 of 2020, 30818 of 2020, 32098-32099 of 2020 and 15301 of 2021
Decided On : 05-07-2021




Elections must adhere to statutory provisions and principles of natural justice, ensuring all parties are afforded a fair opportunity to present their case, particularly in administrative decisions with civil consequences.

Headnote:(A) Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 2(e), 3(d) and 3(e) - Constitutionality of election process for Dental Council of India challenged - Election of President declared illegal due to exceeding age limit and improper electoral roll - The petitioner, facing complaints against his election, was not given adequate chance to respond, violating natural justice principles. (Paras 9-10, 20-21, 44-48)

(B) Natural Justice - Requirement of show cause notice - Communication from the committee to the petitioner qualified as inadequate - Personal hearing denied to petitioner, raising questions on procedural fairness. (Paras 56-60, 62-64)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was elected President of DCI but faced allegations of illegality regarding his election due to age limits and procedural failures in the electoral process, including dual memberships. The Union of India declared his election invalid based on a committee report.

Findings of Court:
Assessment of inclusion of dual membership valid, however, procedural non-compliance led to decision being set aside, and remitted for further adjudication.

Issues: Whether the election was conducted in compliance with statutory and regulatory provisions, eligibility concerning age and dual membership, and adherence to principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: Natural justice principles require that all relevant parties given fair opportunity to present their cases before any administrative decision adversely impacts their interests.

Result: Writ petition allowed in part; impugned order set aside; matter remitted for reconsideration.

Table of Content
1. challenge to election process detailed (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. findings and recommendations of the report (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. petitioner's arguments on natural justice violations (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. respondents argue on jurisdiction and natural justice (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. jurisdiction matters and application of natural justice (Para 40 , 44 , 48)
6. court's observations on the committee process (Para 55 , 59 , 61)
7. final orders and remittance to uoi for reconsideration (Para 64 , 65 , 66)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order of the Union of India ["UOI"] dated 09.11.2020, by which his election to the post of the President of Respondent No. 2-Dental Council of India ["DCI"] was declared illegal and invalid, and the Vice-President was given charge as the President, DCI.

I. Facts

2. The petitioner is a dentist within the meaning of Section 2 (e) of the DENTISTS ACT , 1948 ["the Act"]. He was nominated as a member of the DCI by the State of West Bengal, under Section 3 (e) of the Act, in the year 2010. He was thereafter elected to the post of President, DCI. On 21.05.2015, after the petitioner's term as a member of the DCI under Section 3 (e), he was elected as a member of the DCI under Section 3 (d) of the Act from Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh.

3. However, by a communication dated 11.09.2019, the UOI restrained him from acting as President, DCI on the ground that he had attained the age of 65 years. On 07.10.2019, the UOI declined the DCI's request to reconsider the direction contained in the letter dated 11.09.2019 and clarified that the Secretary, DCI was responsible for ensuring that members whose terms have ended do not continue in the DCI. Against the aforesaid communications dated 11.09.2019 and 07.10.2019, the petitioner has filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court1, which remains pending. In view of the position taken by the UOI, although without accepting its validity, the petitioner resigned from the post of President, DCI on 14.10.2019.

4. In the meanwhile, the petitioner claims to have been elected as a member of the DCI on 03.10.2019, representing the Respondent No. 3-Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan ["MGU"]. According to the petitioner, he was coopted as a member of the Dental Faculty of MGU on 16.08.2019. MGU thereafter constituted a Committee of Court to elect a member of the DCI under Section 3 (d) of the Act. The petitioner was duly elected on 03.10.2019, and the DCI was informed of his election by MGU on 04.10.2019. This was forwarded by the DCI to the UOI on 07.10.2019.

5. Pursuant to the petitioner's resignation as President, DCI, the Secretary, DCI circulated a preliminary agenda dated 29.10.2019, for a General Body Meeting dated 15/16.12.2019. The agenda included inter alia election to the post of President, DCI from amongst the members of the DCI, and induction of new members to the DCI. A list of members, as on that date, was also circulated. This included the name of the petitioner as a member under Section 3 (d) of the Act from MGU. A final agenda was issued on 28.11.2019, including the agenda items mentioned above. Enclosed therewith was an updated list of members, consisting of 87 names. The petitioner's name continued to be shown as a member under Section 3 (d) of the Act from MGU. 1 W.P. No. 21456(W) of 2019

6. By a notification dated 29.11.2019, the petitioner was also nominated as a member of the DCI by the Respondent No. 4-State of Chhattisgarh under Section 3 (e) of the Act. The notification of the State of Chhattisgarh was forwarded by the DCI to the UOI on 09.12.2019, pursuant to a meeting of its Executive Committee held on 05.12.2019.

7. The General Body Meeting was held on 15.12.2019. 87 members, including the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top