IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
J.R. Midha, J.
Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Maharia Raj Joint Venture - Respondent
EX.P. 275 of 2012 & E.A. 193 of 2020 and EX.P. 276 of 2012
Decided On : 24-06-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of execution guidelines for decrees. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. proposal for modifications by learned counsel. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's agreement on necessity of suggestions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. modification of guidelines in judgment. (Para 6) |
| 5. execution proceedings demand urgent attention. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. consequences of delay in execution proceedings. (Para 9) |
| 7. communication and dissemination of judgment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 8. need for effective verification of assets. (Para 12) |
| 9. lessons from international practices on execution. (Para 13) |
| 10. importance of comprehensive asset disclosures. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 11. rights of judgment-debtors and disclosure mandates. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 12. substantive principles guiding execution cases. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 13. property restrictions during execution proceedings. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 14. affidavit requirements for asset disclosure. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 15. adaptation of execution proceedings in practice. (Para 24) |
| 16. legal repercussions for false asset disclosures. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 17. custodial measures for non-compliance in judgments. (Para 27) |
| 18. guidelines for attachment of judgment-debtor assets. (Para 28) |
| 19. judicial discretion in asset verification. (Para 29) |
| 20. effects of litigation statuses on execution. (Para 30 , 31) |
1. This Court laid down the guidelines for execution of the decrees/awards vide judgment dated 05th December, 2019, hereinafter referred to as Bhandari Engineers-I.
2. Vide judgment dated 05th August, 2020, hereinafter referred to as Bhandari Engineers-II, this Court modified the guidelines issued in Bhandari Engineers-I to make them more comprehensive.
3. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate assisting this Court as Amicus Curiae seeks the following modifications in the guidelines issued in Bhandari Engineers-II:
(i) If the execution is filed within two years of the decree/award and the decree-holder has disclosed the assets of the judgment-debtor, the Court shall attach the assets on the very first date of hearing.
(ii) If the decree-holder is not aware of the assets of the judgment-debtor, the Court shall direct the judgment-debtor to deposit the amount within 30 days.
(iii) If the decretal/awarded amount is not deposited by the judgmentdebtor, the judgment-debtor be directed to file the affidavit/additional affidavit of its assets and income within 30 days of the receipt of notice.
(iv) If the amount is deposited by the judgment-debtor within 30 days, the judgment-debtor is not required to file the affidavit/additional affidavit of its assets.
(v) If the judgment-debtor is a Central Government/State Government/Municipal Corporation/PSU/Entity of the Central/State Government/Foreign State, the direction to file the affidavit of assets within 30 days is not necessary in the first instance. In such cases, the Court shall direct the judgment-debtor to disclose the particulars of its bank account(s) in which there is sufficient amount to satisfy the decree/award, on affidavit within 30 days. If the amount in the bank account(s) is not sufficient to satisfy the decree/award, the judgment-debtor be then directed to file the affidavit of its assets in Form 16A of Appendix E under Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(vi) If the execution is filed after two years of the decree/award, notice be issued to the judgment-debtor and the directions relating to the affidavit of assets, attachment and injunction be considered after the service of the judgment-debtor unless the decree-holder makes out a case under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, at the time of issuance of notice.
(vii) The formats of the notices to be issued to the judgment-debtor be prescribed in this judgment for the convenience of the Courts.
(viii) The show cause notice is necessary for detaining the judgment-debtor upon the failure to deposit the decretal/award amount or to file the affidavit of assets.
4. Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, learned Amicus Curiae and Mr. S. S. Jauhar, lear
Court's direction on mandatory disclosure of judgment-debtor's assets, incomes, and expenditures to expedite execution proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the directions to the directors to furnish details of their personal properties do not follow as a matter of course in every case of execution....
Order XXI Rule 37 of CPC provides that when an application is filed in execution proceedings for payment of money seeking arrest and civil imprisonment of judgment debtor, court would issue a notice ....
The requirement under Section 44-A(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to file a non-satisfaction certificate from a foreign court is a procedural rule of evidence rather than a mandatory jurisdictiona....
Wilful non-compliance with court orders justifies the issuance of arrest warrants against a judgment debtor.
The sanctity of settlements recorded by the court and the obligation of parties to honor such settlements.
Point of Law : Even on merits, it is not possible to hold that the respondent has made out a clear case for dismissal of the present execution petition, for want of territorial jurisdiction on the gr....
In matters of maintenance, full disclosure of financial information by both parties is essential; incomplete disclosure may lead to adverse inferences for determining interim and final maintenance.
Procedural compliance is critical in Judgment Debtor Summons; historical financial records may be pertinent for understanding a debtor's liabilities under Section 4 of the Debtors Act 1957.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.