Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA MUAR
MTRUSTEE BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
TASHIMA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal concerning judgment debtor summons (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of the civil suits and judgments (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. procedural aspect of document production (Para 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 4. importance of a complete financial disclosure (Para 18 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. jd's argument against relevance of historical financial data (Para 28 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. need for document relevancy in examination (Para 44 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 7. appropriateness of court for commencing jds (Para 54 , 56 , 59) |
| 8. decision of the sar is upheld; appeal dismissed (Para 61 , 63 , 65) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal to the Judge in Chambers against the decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar relating to a Judgment Debtor Summons (JDS).
[2] It concerns documents which can be ordered by the Court to be produced by the Judgment Debtor in a Judgment Debtor Summons.
[3] Parties will be referred to as the Judgment Creditor (JC) and Judgment Debtor (JD) respectively.
[4] All the above three appeals were heard together. This judgment is for all three appeals.
Background Facts
[5] The JC had commenced three (3) individual civil suits in the Sessions Court for outstanding r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
