Maya D. Chablani vs Radha Mittal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
J.R.MIDHA
Maya D. Chablani – Appellant
Versus
Radha Mittal – Respondent

Table of Content
1. dispute resolution regarding stray dogs. (Para 1 , 2)
2. compassion and ethical treatment of animals emphasized. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal framework supporting animal welfare. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. guidelines for managing stray dogs established. (Para 17 , 25 , 33 , 37 , 44)
5. rights of animals under the constitution enforced. (Para 72 , 99 , 100)
6. implementation committee formed for proper compliance. (Para 146 , 150 , 152 , 156 , 157)

JUDGMENT

1. The plaintiff has filed I.A. No. 4164/2021 to restrain defendant No.1 from feeding the stray dogs near the entrance/exit of the suit property. However, the dispute between the parties relating to the feeding of the stray dogs has been amicably resolved with the assistance of Mr. Pragyan Sharma, learned Amicus Curiae and Ms. Manisha T. Karia, learned counsel for Animal Welfare Board of India. The settlement between the parties on this issue has been recorded in the order dated 05th May, 2021, according to which, defendant No.1 agreed to feed the stray dogs at point A at fixed times. Relevant portion of the order dated 05th May, 2021 is reproduced hereunder:

"I.A. No. 4164/2021

4. Learned counsels for both the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJ.R.MIDHAMaya D. Chablani – AppellantVersusRadha Mittal – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
J.R.MIDHA
Maya D. Chablani – Appellant
Versus
Radha Mittal – Respondent