Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Delhi Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Himgiri Realtors Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of appeal under commercial courts act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. condonation of delay due to covid-19 and personal issues. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. lack of opposition indicates acceptance of delay. (Para 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. execution petition initiated under arbitral award. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. need for immediate execution proceedings. (Para 12 , 17) |
| 6. importance of maintaining judicial oversight. (Para 13 , 21) |
| 7. arguments against automatic filing of affidavits. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 8. questions of maintainability raised. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. clarification on scope of appeals. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. commercial division jurisdiction to execute arbitral awards. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 11. execution applications governed under commercial courts act. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 12. differences in execution procedures highlighted. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 13. reviewing the bhandari engineers case precedents. (Para 45 , 46) |
| 14. impact of rights violations in execution proceedings. (Para 56 , 61) |
| 15. final decision to set aside impugned orders. (Para 63 , 64 , 65) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. This appeal, under Section 13 (1A) of the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT , 2015, impugning the orders d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
