SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Manju Rani – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Property Dealer – Respondent


Table of Content
1. delay in handling case; urgency. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's directive for expeditious trial. (Para 4 , 5)
3. petition disposed with directions. (Para 6)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Asha Menon, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.19653/2021 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stand disposed of.

CM (M) 417/2021

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the learned Trial Court dated 5th June, 2021 in Civil Suit No. 95251/2016 thereby declining to treat the matter as urgent for early listing.

2. Ms. Komal Chhibber, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had approached this Court twice before as litigation in this case had commenced in the year 1988 and the matter was not being taken up for hearing by the Trial Court and vide two orders dated 11th October, 2019 and 3rd March, 2021, this Court had directed the learned Trial Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously. Yet, it is submitted by learned counsel, the learned Trial Court has dismissed the application moved by the petitioner for early hearing of the matter as en-bloc dates were being given in not so urgent matters.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner infor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top