Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Riddhima Singh – Appellant
Versus
Central Board of Secondary Education – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. motion for review of a dismissed writ petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's argument on jurisdiction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on territorial jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. arguments on cause of action and jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's view on correctness of previous judgment. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. dismissal of the review petition. (Para 13 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
REVIEW PET. 94/2021 & CM APPL. 19781/2021 (for consideration)
1. By way of this review petition, the petitioner seeks review of the judgment of this Court dated 04.06.2021 by which W.P.(C) No. 6007 of 2019 filed by the petitioner was dismissed. The petitioner has also filed CM. APPL. 19781/2021 with the title "application for considering this writ along with amendment application and to provide opportunity to defent my case".
2. By the judgment under review, this Court has held that the writ petition is not maintainable on the grounds of forum non conveniens, and dismissed the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate court for the same relief.
3. The rev
A review petition cannot serve as an opportunity to reargue matters previously adjudicated, and territorial jurisdiction is determined by the location of the relevant grievance, not the location of a....
Education Law - Non-payment of fees - Mere presence of CBSE as a respondent in petition is not sufficient to enable this Court to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution. The Court ma....
The principle of forum non conveniens allows courts to decline jurisdiction if a more appropriate forum exists, particularly in education-related disputes where the School is located outside the cour....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cause of action must arise within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court for the exercise of power under Article 226 of the Consti....
The court reaffirmed that a review petition cannot substitute for an appeal and must strictly address clear errors without reevaluating merits or facts.
Territorial jurisdiction of a High Court cannot be invoked solely based on the respondent's headquarters location; the court must apply the doctrine of forum non-conveniens when the material, essenti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
