SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Anju Jalaj Batra – Appellant
Versus
National E-Assessment Centre Additional Joint Deputy Assistant Commissiner of Income Tax Office – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to assessment order and procedures (Para 2 , 3)
2. citing precedent and respondent's arguments (Para 4 , 5)
3. violation of section 144b and natural justice (Para 6 , 7)
4. setting aside the assessment order with liberty to re-assess (Para 8)
5. disposition of the writ petition (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging assessment order dated 22nd April, 2021 passed by respondent no.1-National Faceless Assessment Center, Delhi under Section 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short `the Act'] for assessment year 2018-19. Petitioner seeks to restrain the respondent from giving effect to/proceeding further pursuant to the impugned order as well as demand notice and penalty notice dated 22nd April, 2021.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was issued Notice under Section 142(1) of the Act, to which the petitioner replied and furnished relevant details/explanations. He further states that despite the petitioner's replies, the respondent issued impugned assessment order without issuing a mandatory draft assessment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top