SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Vimlesh Vedwal (HC/GD) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. modes of filling the head constable post (Para 3)
2. petitioner's promotion and seniority confusion (Para 4 , 5)
3. claim of seniority and principles of natural justice (Para 6 , 8)
4. entitlement to seniority governed by law (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
5. decision outcome - writ petition dismissed (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

CM No.20559/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 6546/2021 & CM No.20558/2021(for ad interim ex parte relief)

3. The filling up of the post of Head Constable General Duty (HC/GD) in the respondents Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), is through three modes, i.e., 85% by promotion from feeder cadre, 10% through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) and 5% through Direct Recruitment under the sports category.

4. It is the case of the petitioner, that the petitioner, a Constable in the respondents CRPF, participated in LDCE advertised in the year 2015 for 1641 vacancies for the post of HC/GD, and took the written test on 14th February 2016 and that in the result declared on 21st September 2016 of the said LDC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top