Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Karan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's dismissal details from bsf. (Para 3) |
| 2. counsel's argument regarding procedural rules. (Para 5) |
| 3. statutory petition arguments not preserved. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. petitioner's behavior impacts leniency. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. no merit in reconsidering dismissal. (Para 14 , 20) |
| 6. language of proceedings not raised during trial. (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
CM No. 20013/2021 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant Rules.
2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 6357/2021 and CM No. 20012/2021 (for interim orders)
3. The petitioner, appointed as a Constable in the respondent Border Security Force (BSF) on 5th January, 2001, has filed this petition impugning the order dated 20th June, 2019 of the Inspector General of BSF of dismissal of the statutory petition under Section 117 of the BSF Act, 1968 (BSF Act), preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 9th January, 2019 of the Summary Security Force Court holding the petitioner guilty of the charges of (i) assaulting a superior officer, (ii) insubordination, and (iii) being intoxicated on duty and imposing the punishment under Sec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
