DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Astrazeneca AB – Appellant
Versus
Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. All these nine appeals, under Section 13 (1A) of the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT , 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), impugn the orders/judgments of denial of interim relief, in suits instituted by the appellants/plaintiffs i.e. (i) AstraZeneca AB, Sweden and (ii) AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd. against the respondent(s)/defendant(s) in each of the appeals, for permanent injunction restraining infringement of patent and for ancillary reliefs.
2. FAO(OS)(COMM) 139/2020 and FAO(OS)(COMM) 140/2020 impugn the common order/judgment dated 2nd November, 2020 in CS(COMM) No.410/2020 and in CS(COMM) No.411/2020 filed by the appellants/plaintiffs against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. respectively.
3. FAO(OS)(COMM) 155/2020, FAO(OS)(COMM) 156/2020, FAO(OS)(COMM) 157/2020, FAO(OS)(COMM) 158/2020, FAO(OS)(COMM) 159/2020, FAO(OS)(COMM) 160/2020 and FAO(OS)(COMM) 161/2020 impugn the common order/judgment dated 18th November, 2020 in suits filed by the same appellants/plaintiffs, being (i) CS(COMM) No.323/2020 against Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; (ii) CS(COMM) No.346/2020
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.