Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
FMC Corporation – Appellant
Versus
GSP Crop Science Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of plaintiffs and patent details (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. details of the patent infringement claim and process (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's interim directions regarding proceedings (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. arguments from the defendant regarding patent validity (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. historical context of prior litigations concerning ctpr (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. insights on patent complexities and potential for monopolies (Para 26 , 27 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. principles regarding prior claiming and invalidity (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. conclusions about the suit patent's validity (Para 70 , 71) |
| 9. final judgment and ruling on the plaintiff's request (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
I.A.15628/2022 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC)
Brief Facts
2. The present is a suit filed by Plaintiff No.1 - FMC Corporation, USA and its two group companies i.e., Plaintiff No. 2 - FMC Agro Singapore Pvt. Ltd and Plaintiff No.3 - FMC India Pvt. Ltd. seeking inter alia, an injunction restraining the infringement of Indian Patent No. IN252004 titled "Method for Preparing Fused Oxazino
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
