SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
FMC Corporation - Appellant
Versus
GSP Crop Science Private Limited - Respondent
CS(COMM) 662 of 2022, I.A. 15628 of 2022 and 16508 of 2022
Decided On : 14-11-2022




Patent is prima facie invalid due to prior claiming and non-working, infringing on patent system integrity by prolonging monopoly post-expiration.

Headnote:(A) Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 64(1)(a), 104A, 3(d) - Infringement of patent for manufacturing process and intermediate - Plaintiffs sought injunction against Defendant for allegedly infringing Indian Patent No. IN252004 - Plaintiffs claim lack of industrial applicability and suppression of facts posed a challenge to validity - Court found prima facie invalidity of the suit patent due to prior claiming and non-working - Balance of convenience favored Defendant. (Paras 1, 25, 70, 72)

(B) Patent Validity - Prior claiming - For a patent to be granted, the invention must not have been claimed in an earlier patent; here, similarities between the suit patent and earlier patent IN.332 established basis for doubt in validity. (Paras 34, 52, 70)

(C) Patent Enforcement - Existence of multiple patents by a singular entity over a single invention not permissible under patent laws; this practice can violate inventor rights and inhibit fair competition. (Paras 31, 72)

Facts of the case:
Plaintiffs, including foreign entities, alleged the Defendant infringed their process patent for the production of a certain intermediate used in insecticides. The Defendant denied infringement claims, alleging the suit patent lacked validity and was designed to extend monopoly after previous patents expired.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the suit patent was prima facie invalid, had not been worked for 19 years, and that the balance of convenience favored the Defendant, allowing the launch of their product.

Issues: Main issues pertained to the validity of the suit patent, allegations of infringement, and balance of convenience for granting an injunction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the suit patent was prima facie invalid due to prior claims in another patent and the lack of commercial utility which heavily impacted the injunction decision.

Result: Application for interim injunction dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of plaintiffs and patent details (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. details of the patent infringement claim and process (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's interim directions regarding proceedings (Para 12 , 14 , 15)
4. arguments from the defendant regarding patent validity (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. historical context of prior litigations concerning ctpr (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25)
6. insights on patent complexities and potential for monopolies (Para 26 , 27 , 30 , 31)
7. principles regarding prior claiming and invalidity (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
8. conclusions about the suit patent's validity (Para 70 , 71)
9. final judgment and ruling on the plaintiff's request (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

I.A.15628/2022 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC)

Brief Facts

2. The present is a suit filed by Plaintiff No.1 - FMC Corporation, USA and its two group companies i.e., Plaintiff No. 2 - FMC Agro Singapore Pvt. Ltd and Plaintiff No.3 - FMC India Pvt. Ltd. seeking inter alia, an injunction restraining the infringement of Indian Patent No. IN252004 titled "Method for Preparing Fused Oxazinones from Ortho-Amino Aromatic Carboxylic Acid and a Carboxylic Acid in the presence of a Sulfonyl Chloride and Pyridine" (hereinafter "IN.004/suit patent") by the Defendant-GSP Crop Science Private Limited.

3. The Plaintiffs are companies engaged in the manufacture, marketing and sale of chemicals including agro chemicals. They carry on business in India and several other countries of the world.

4. The pleaded case is that Plaintiff No.1 was founded in 1883 as Bean Spray Pump Company by John Bean, who developed the first piston-pump insecticide sprayer. Thereafter, in 1928 Bean Spray Pump purchased Anderson-Barngrover Co. and Sprague-Sells Co. and changed its company name to Food Machinery Corporation (FMC). Over the years it expanded its areas of business in India and around the world to various sectors including defense, gold mining, tractors etc.

5. Plaintiff No.1 was divided in 2001 into two separate, publically traded companies - a machinery business (FMC Technologies) and a chemicals business (FMC Corporation). On 31st December, 2001, FMC Corporation completed the spin off of FMC Technologies.

6. As per the Plaintiffs, in November, 2017, Plaintiff No. 1 along with its subsidiary company i.e. Plaintiff No. 2 acquired a significant portion of the Crop Protection business of E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company (hereinafter `Du Pont'). This acquisition included certain physical and IP assets around the world. One of the patents acquired by the Plaintiffs from Du Pont is the suit patent. The said patent was acquired vide assignment agreements with an effective date of 1st November, 2017 and was duly assigned to the Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2.

7. The present suit patent relates to an intermediate stated to be used in the manufacture of one of the products sold by the Plaintiffs i.e. Chlorantraniliprole (`CTPR'), which is an insecticide product. The suit patent is a process/method patent, originally filed in the name of the Plaintiffs' predecessor Du Pont and thereafter assigned to the Plaintiffs vide the aforementioned assignment agreement. The bibliographic details of the suit patent are as under:

Indian Patent NoIN 252004
Application No3877/DELNP/2004
Title"Method for Preparing Fused Oxazinones from Ortho-Amino Aromatic Carboxylic Acid and a Carboxylic Acid in the presence of a Sulfonyl Chloride and Pyridine"
ApplicantE.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Date of filing in India07.12.2004
International Application NoPCT/US2003/023821
International filing date29.07.2003
Priority Dates31.07.2002; 11.02.2003
WO Publication NoWO 2004/011447 A1 published on 05.02.2004
Section 11A Publication20.11.2009 The application was published in the official gazette issued by the Patent Office thereby being open for public to file pre-grant opposition.
Date of Grant20.0



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top