SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Suraj Bhan Chauhan - Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 6613 of 2021 & CM Appl. 20793 of 2021
Decided On : 20-07-2021




A revocation of a building plan without adequate notice and opportunity for hearing violates natural justice principles under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 338 - Revocation of building plan - The petitioner challenges the revocation of a sanctioned building plan on grounds of lack of adequate notice and hearing - Communication regarding the show cause notice was inadequately handled, breaching principles of natural justice - The court mandates that a fresh speaking order be issued after a fair hearing is granted. (Paras 3-10)

(B) Natural Justice - The principle of natural justice mandates that an affected party must be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case before any adverse decision is taken against them. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contests the revocation of the building plan, stating that no hearing was provided, and that a reply to the show cause notice was disregarded.

Findings of Court:
The impugned order was set aside due to the breach of natural justice principles, with a directive for a fresh hearing on the matter.

Issues: Key issues include the adequacy of notice and the opportunity for the petitioner to respond before revocation of a sanctioned building plan.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the dismissal of the petitioner's reply amounted to a violation of natural justice principles, necessitating a fresh and fair hearing.

Result: Petition is disposed of as directed.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner impugns order dated 22.06.2021 whereby the respondent Corporation has revoked the sanctioned building plan under Section 338 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the DMC Act).

3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that no show cause notice was ever served on the petitioner. He submits that a show cause notice dated 04.06.2021 was served on the architect and from the architect, the petitioner got to know of the same and accordingly sent a reply on 18.06.2021, however, the impugned order dated 22.06.2021 records that no reply to the said show cause notice has been received till then despite passage of stipulated time.

4. Learned senior counsel submits that no hearing as mandated under Section 338 of the DMC Act has been granted to the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that show cause notice was duly sent to the petitioner by speed post. He, however, concedes that at the time of passing of the order the reply has not been taken into account.

6. He further submits that the construction plan was sanctioned under the Saral Scheme by the architect by making misrepresentations. Accordingly action has been taken against the architect. He further submits that since the property is situated in an unauthorised colony no construction activity is permitted therein.

7. Section 338 of the DMC Act reads as under:-

    "338. Sanction accorded under misrepresentation --If at any time after the sanction of any building or work has been accorded, the Commissioner is satisfied that such sanction was accorded in consequence of any material misrepresentation or fraudulent statement contained in the notice given or information further under sections 333, 334 and 335, he may be order in writing cancel for reasons to be recorded such sanction and any building or work commenced, erected or done shall be deemed to have been commenced, erected or done without such sanction:

    Provided that before making any such order the Commissioner shall give reasonable opportunity to the person affected as to why such order should not be made."

8. Proviso to Section 338 of the DMC Act mandates that before making any order under Section 338 DMC Act, the Commissioner shall give reasonable opportunity to the person affected, as to why such order should not be made.

9. In the present case the show cause notice dated 04.06.2021 is alleged to have been sent to the petitioner. The petitioner has filed a reply to the show cause notice which was received in the office of the SDMC on 18.06.2021 and specifically stated that notice has not been served upon him and he got to know of the same from the architect.

10. However, the impugned order records that no reply to the show cause notice has been received which clearly establishes that the reply given by the petitioner has not been taken into account at the time of passing the impugned order. Accordingly there is ex facie breach of the principles of natural justice as mandated by Section 338 of the DMC Act. On this count alone, order dated 22.06.2021 cannot be sustained.

11. In view of the above, impugned order dated 22.06.2021 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the respondents to pass a fresh speaking order on the show cause notice dated 04.06.2021 after giving an opportunity of a hearing to the petitioner.

12. It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor expressed any opinion on the merits of the show cause notice or the reply given by the petitioner. Respondents would be at liberty to pass a fresh speaking order without being influenced by anything stated in this order.

13. Since one of the issues raised by the respondent Corporation is with regard to raising of a construction in an unauthorised colony, it is directed that the petitioner shall not carry out any further construction activity or create any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top