IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Nikhil Bhattal - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail Appln. 1520 of 2021
Decided On : 22-07-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the bail application and allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. status report indicates evidence collection. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments for and against bail application. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. conditions for granting bail explained. (Para 9) |
| 5. final order regarding the bail application. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J. This petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.118/2021 dated 10.04.2021 registered at Police Station South Rohini for offences punishable under Sections 328 , 389 and 34 IPC.
2. The brief facts leading to this bail application are as follows:
a) A complaint was filed by one Rishab Jain (Complainant) stating that has a business of marble and tiles and he runs a Shop at B-81, Marble market, Mangolpur Kalan, opposite Indian Bank, New Delhi. He stated that the petitioner herein came to his shop and asked for some good quality marble stones/tiles for renovation of his residence and he insisted that the complainant must visit his house. It is stated that when the complainant visited the house of the petitioner. The petitioner introduced the complainant to his girlfriend, lshu @ Bobby, who lives with the petitioner. It is stated that the said Ishu @ Bobby offered soft drink to the complainant. It is stated that after consuming the drink the complainant started feeling dizzy. It is stated that the petitioner asked the complainant to take rest and he left the room. It is stated that after the petitioner left the room the said Ishu @ Bobby came close to the complainant and started rubbing his head and thereafter the complainant became unconscious. It is stated that when the complainant regained consciousness he was shocked to see that Ishu @ Bobby was rubbing his private part. It is stated that the complainant went outside the room and when the petitioner came back, the complainant narrated the incident to him. It is stated that the petitioner got furious and broke the phone of his girlfriend. It is stated in the complaint that the petitioner started demanding a mobile phone, a TV and Rs.2,00,000/- in cash from the complainant and threatened him that if his demands are not met, his girlfriend would file a case of rape against the complainant. It is stated that after the incident, the petitioner called the complainant for money more than 25 times. The complainant also produced various voice recordings in which the petitioner and his girlfriend are demanding money from the complainant and threatening him that if their demands are not met a case of rape would be filed against the complainant. On the complaint, FIR No.118/2021 dated 10.04.2021 was registered at Police Station South Rohini for offences punishable under Sections 328 , 389 and 34 IPC.
b) It is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner and his girlfriend, Ishu @ Bobby also filed a complaint against the complainant herein, being FIR No.119/2021, dated 10.04.2021, for offences under sections 376/506 IPC.
c) The petitioner was arrested on 11.04.2021.
d) The petitioner filed an application for bail, being Bail application No.1280/2021, before the learned Sessions Judge, North West District, Rohini Courts, which was rejected vide order dated 22.04.2021.
e) A second application for bail was filed by the petitioner on 23.04.2021 which was rejected by the learned Sessions Judge, North West District, Rohini Courts, vide order dated 28.04.2021 on the ground that the investigation of the case is at a nascent stage and the possibility of the petitioner threatening the complainant cannot be ruled out.
f) The petitioner has, thereafter, approached this Court by filing the instant bail application.
3. Notice was issued on 10.05.2021. Status Report has been filed. The Status Report indicates that the voice sample of the petitioner was obtained after taking the permission of the Court and the same has been sent to Forensic Science Laboratory. The Status Report also indicates that opin
Bail can be granted when the charge-sheet is filed, and conditions can be imposed to ensure the complainant's safety without unjustly detaining the accused.
Bail granted - Putting person in fear of accusation of offence - Just because complainant is alleging that he is getting threatening calls, it will not be appropriate to keep the accused in custody a....
Anticipatory bail is denied when the applicant poses a risk of fleeing and obstructing an ongoing investigation into serious allegations.
The court balanced the need for fair investigation and prevention of harassment in deciding on the grant of anticipatory bail.
The main legal point established is the careful consideration of the nature of accusations, antecedents of the accused, and the possibility of tampering with witnesses in granting anticipatory bail.
A court may grant bail if doubts arise concerning the authenticity of the FIR and the possibility of false implication, especially in matrimonial disputes.
A bail application may be granted when the accused has been in custody for an extended period, all witnesses have been examined, and there is no threat of evidence tampering.
Bail can be granted when the allegations do not involve direct participation in serious crimes, and the accused demonstrates willingness to cooperate with the investigation.
Doubt in the delayed FIR registration and conduct of the complainant's family influenced the court's decision in granting bail to the petitioner.
The legal principle established is that consent must involve active and reasoned deliberation, and a false promise of marriage must be given in bad faith with no intention of being adhered to at the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.